Cette page ne donne rien. A la limite regarde le lien geoportail.
https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/donnees/restrictions-uas-categorie-ouverte-et-aeromodelismeLe lien donne sur la page FB de pg forum ou l'on retrouve le texte posté par Marc Asquith concernant les espaces U.
"I have a couple of comments on what has been written by others. I should explain that I am the current President of the European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) and its delegate to Europe Airsports (EAS) which is the representative body for all airsports in Europe and is recognised and consulted by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). ( The pan-European version of the FAA )
As a result, I have had the chance to sit on some of EASA's Electronic Conspicuity (EC) working groups. Here in Europe EASA is also looking at dedicated low level airspace for drones - EASA have titled this 'U-space'. If we are to fly in U-space we need to carry an EC device but EASA are currently looking very favourably at requiring drone operators to be able to 'see' us via a number of different systems, so ADS-B, Flarm, Pilot Aware are the most obvious ones, but also, since we almost all carry smart phones, apps are being developed using the phones GPS to broadcast our position - thus allowing the drone operators to avoid us.
As someone else posted earlier, ADS-B devices are now small and light enough for us to use them, but they do have a short coming - the human body does shield the signal - so positioning needs to be thought about. ( see the attached image ). The image was obtained by a paramotor pilot with the SkyEcho mounted on the frame facing forwards. The 90 degree quadrant of no transmission in the bottom left corner is the effect of the pilot's body. The black ring is a 20km radius from the pilot.
As for the thinking about rights of way, power gives way to sail etc. We will only be able to enter U-Space if we are carrying an EC device - hence the attraction of a phone based app.
Terrain also makes a difference in respect of the problems that might be caught by U-space, so putting a patch of U-Space over the centre of a major city will have almost zero effect on us. In flatlands, corridors of U-space should be easily avoided, they are only going to affect outlandings at the end of an XC and at 400 feet, it's rare that you are going to get a low save just as you pass through the corridor. My main concern is mountainous areas where a corridor might run along a valley floor - just where we might be forced to land.
Finally, we do not want to see U-space blocking up even more airspace, where it can safely do so, U-space should be routed inside airspace that is already closed to us."
